Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to the Power Users community on Codidact!

Power Users is a Q&A site for questions about the usage of computer software and hardware. We are still a small site and would like to grow, so please consider joining our community. We are looking forward to your questions and answers; they are the building blocks of a repository of knowledge we are building together.

Review Suggested Edit

You can't approve or reject suggested edits because you haven't yet earned the Edit Posts ability.

Approved.
This suggested edit was approved and applied to the post about 2 months ago by samcarter‭.

0 / 255
  • Motherboard memory bus speed
  • Why don't motherboards support the highest RAM Speeds?
I'm about to build a desktop PC first time in many years and I was confused by the following discrepancy related to memory speeds:
- Zen5 CPUs "natively" support DDR5-5600 RAM (for example [9600X](https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen/9000-series/amd-ryzen-5-9600x.html))
- even faster DDR5 modules are available, I have seen at least DDR5-6400

Yet motherboards, even with the newest X870E chipset support only up to DDR5-5200 "natively" and require overclocking for higher speeds (for example the currently most expensive Gigabyte model [X870E AORUS MASTER](https://www.gigabyte.com/Motherboard/X870E-AORUS-MASTER/sp#sp)).

So my first question is what are the possible disadvantages of setting a motherboard's memory bus to an overclocked speed that is "natively" supported by both the CPU and the DDR5 modules I intend to purchase.

The second question is why is it so? What stops motherboard producers to "natively" support speeds that already are already "natively" supported by CPUs and DDR5 modules that these motherboards were designed for?

PS: I put the word `natively` in quotes as I'm not sure if it's the right adjective to describe the speed at which a given component works without overclocking.

**Update:** specs from other manufacturers have been recently published and many of them do support 5600 "natively" (for example [MSI Tomahawk](https://www.msi.com/Motherboard/MAG-X870-TOMAHAWK-WIFI/Specification)).

Suggested about 2 months ago by matthewsnyder‭