Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to the Power Users community on Codidact!

Power Users is a Q&A site for questions about the usage of computer software and hardware. We are still a small site and would like to grow, so please consider joining our community. We are looking forward to your questions and answers; they are the building blocks of a repository of knowledge we are building together.

Comments on Software Recommendations Category

Post

Software Recommendations Category

+7
−2

On the original proposal for Power User, there was talk about allowing software recommendations on the site. Now that the site is up and running, I'd like to bring that request over to this Meta.

Could we have a "Software Recommendations" category, similar to other communities such as Outdoors' or Photography's Gear Recommendations?


Draft Guidelines

See also: How to ask a great question

  • A request should have objective criteria that can be used to judge whether an answer is applicable.

  • Should be able to go without saying, but a request should be within the scope of Power Users[1].

    • Rule of thumb: If the type of software is on-topic in Q&A, it is on-topic to request.
  • Posters should avoid radically changing or adding restrictions to their request. (Do not invalidate existing answers.)

  • Posters should show what programs they've already tried, and what they found lacking in them.


  1. Whatever the scope is decided to be. ↩︎

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (8 comments)
General comments
Monica Cellio‭ wrote over 3 years ago

laugh Now we see who's paying attention. Just getting ready to announce this now... :-)

Lundin‭ wrote over 3 years ago

If this is to be included, it needs some very clear directions of how to post such questions. A use case, some specific requirements etc. Otherwise it risks ending up with "hey anyone know any good games?", "what web browser is best?" and similar low quality question. Also, the gear recommendation categories on the mentioned sites have not done well at all.

Monica Cellio‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Could somebody propose some high-level guidelines for questions in such a category? We need questions to capture core requirements and not be too subjective. This wouldn't be the first category (or whole community) built around recommendations; does somebody have some proposed language to start with?

Moshi‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@MonicaCellio I could write up some draft guidelines. Do you want me to add it as a response or edit it into this post?

Monica Cellio‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Thanks Moshi. Since we don't have any answers yet anyway, how about adding them to the question? Then if people want to respond to specific parts they can use answers for that. Sound good?

Moshi‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@MonicaCellio Sounds good to me.

Moshi‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@Lundin I have added some guidelines to the post, what do you think?

Lundin‭ wrote over 3 years ago

It's better but I don't like the idea as whole. It's an open invitation to subjective, bad questions no matter how well you phrase the rules.