Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to the Power Users community on Codidact!

Power Users is a Q&A site for questions about the usage of computer software and hardware. We are still a small site and would like to grow, so please consider joining our community. We are looking forward to your questions and answers; they are the building blocks of a repository of knowledge we are building together.

Comments on Would questions about software systems design limitations be on-topic here?

Parent

Would questions about software systems design limitations be on-topic here?

+4
−1

A user suggested that Why most hosting providers support ticket systems allow text only (no formatting)? might be on-topic here. It is quite clear that it is offtopic on Software Development.

It is an interesting question (its body might be improved though), but I am not sure if it would be a good fit on Power Users Codidact.

Generally speaking, I am interested if questions about the rationale or limitations of software systems design should be on-topic in this community.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (1 comment)
Post
+5
−1

If it is possible that someone who isn't a developer of that software (or such software) can objectively answer the question, then I think it would be on-topic.

If answers involve speculation about the developer's rationale or in case there are no sources to be found explaining why the software was designed in a certain way, then I don't think it is suitable for any Codidact site.

Questions asking why a certain feature is missing from software seems kind of impossible to answer without speculation. The question you refer to is just like that. Another example: "Why doesn't MS Teams have a push-to-talk button? All gamer VoIP software have this since some 20 years back." It's a reasonable question to ask, but can only be answered by Microsoft, so it is a bad fit for any Q&A site.

Also such questions are easily "rant in disguise" - my example above could be just that. I could as well have asked "Are the designers of this product ******, have they truly never experienced open mic, have they never used computers before, why didn't they look at existing software before releasing this ****?". Which isn't very nice, it likely violates our Code of Conduct, but fills the very same purpose - ranting. And the poster isn't really expecting any sensible answer, they just want to vent their frustration or badmouth a certain product.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (9 comments)
General comments
deleted user wrote over 3 years ago

Questions asking why a certain feature is missing from software seems kind of impossible to answer without speculation. The question you refer to is just like that. I disagree ; my question is about a general phenomenon, not a specific one and hence there might be some rationale there that most of us users here aren't aware of and can learn about.

Lundin‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@JohnDoea‭ How is questions asking for speculation on overly broad topics any better than those asking for speculation of specific things though? That just means there's multiple problems: too broad, asking for opinions, possibly cannot be answered at all, and so on. It essentially boils down to: can anyone reasonably answer this with facts and references to sources? Or are all answers just very likely to be speculation and opinions?

Lundin‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Apart from that I really don't think the question belongs on Power Users either. Software Development does supposedly allow program design questions, but when we proposed that to be on-topic, then at least I thought the scope would be limited to design questions about the program that someone is developing themselves.

deleted user wrote over 3 years ago

too broad, asking for opinions, possibly cannot be answered and can anyone reasonably answer this with facts and references that's too StackExchangeish for me ; I don't think it's too broad at all; if all grand hosters do so there can be some good rationale which to me is just not too broad for any question anywhere and can easily be answered; for me someone with proven experience from within the industry (from within inside it) is often better than a "reference" whatever that means.

Lundin‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@JohnDoea A lot of the rules on SE actually originate out of common sense. If you were to ask me such a question and I have domain knowledge because I work at a company making such products, I'll very likely be gagged by a NDA with my employer. So it will only lead to broad and vague answers - overall low quality. This is the very difference between a Q&A site and an Internet forum. If you want broad & fuzzy subjective discussion where everyone drops their personal opinions, use a forum.

Lundin‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Codidact isn't striving to become Quora 2 or Reddit 2... because those sites and many others like them already exist.

deleted user wrote over 3 years ago · edited over 3 years ago

@Lundin, you have responded to so many things I didn't write that I don't even know where to begin; I disagree with pretty much everything of it but about I'll very likely be gagged by a NDA with my employer. So it will only lead to broad and vague answers Well I think that, na - not in this case (about other people at least); if there is a general information security problem with Markdown or any other formatting I personally don't recognize how it would be any secret by any NDA.

deleted user wrote over 3 years ago · edited over 3 years ago

And of course people can work somewhere even 1 month and switch a company, happens so much these days.

deleted user wrote over 3 years ago

Rules originating in common sense we can find pretty much everywhere, that doesn't mean the system is efficient / moral in its entirety.