Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to the Power Users community on Codidact!

Power Users is a Q&A site for questions about the usage of computer software and hardware. We are still a small site and would like to grow, so please consider joining our community. We are looking forward to your questions and answers; they are the building blocks of a repository of knowledge we are building together.

Comments on Simple text editor for Linux with support for coloring individual words

Post

Simple text editor for Linux with support for coloring individual words

+3
−0

I'm looking for a text processor that can color specific words, just like Microsoft Wordpad can (select a word -> click the color button -> choose a color), but for a GNU/Linux system.

I have considered Libreoffice but it is too big and requires installing 60 dependencies. Since all I want is to color words — no font changing, no inserting images, no fancy layouts and whatnot —, it's just overkill. Similarly with Latex.

Vim can color words matching patterns, but not individual words. For example, :match Label /codidact/ would color every occurrence of "codidact".

Any suggestion of a simple word processor with coloring support, TUI (preferred) or GUI, is appreciated.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Terminology (2 comments)
Show more
Terminology
Canina‭ wrote over 3 years ago · edited over 3 years ago

A note on terminology; neither LibreOffice Writer, Microsoft Word or Abiword are text editors; they are word processors. Examples of text editors are pico/nano, Notepad, Mousepad, Vi/Vim, Emacs. One thing that tends to set a word processor apart from a text editor is the ability to set various types of formatting within a document, and have that formatting preserved across save/open cycles. Such formatting is typically not supported by pure text encodings, so requires some kind of document format support.

Editors with support for, for example, Markdown rendering, sort of straddle the boundary between the two in this regard, but are still typically considered text editors rather than word processors because they still work with plain text, and just have features built into them that make some text more plain than other text.

There is nothing wrong with looking for a lightweight word processor, but to reduce the risk of confusion, it's probably best to not call it a text editor.

Quasímodo‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Canina‭ Thanks for bringing this up. I'd say word processor is a subcategory of text editors, since both can edit (pure) text. But I agree that the question seeks a word processor, since it's about coloring words. Edited.