Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to the Power Users community on Codidact!

Power Users is a Q&A site for questions about the usage of computer software and hardware. We are still a small site and would like to grow, so please consider joining our community. We are looking forward to your questions and answers; they are the building blocks of a repository of knowledge we are building together.

Comments on How to make selection and overwrite from register all from ex mode

Parent

How to make selection and overwrite from register all from ex mode

+2
−0

MWE

line 1
line 2
line 3
line 4
line 5
line 6
line 7
  1. Go to "line 4": /line 4 ENT.
  2. Delete into register: dd.
  3. Replace everything with register using only ex mode. (Non-ex equivalent: gg V G p.)
line 4

Problem

I am uncertain how to proceed with Step 3. I would assume it's something like :-3,+2v | p, with relative line numbering, but that doesn't work.

Notes

I understand in this example you can take the approach of deleting everything but line 4, but that's not what I'm looking for. This is just an example, the use case is more complex.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+3
−0

If you know the normal mode key sequence to achieve the desired result, you can always feed it to the ex-mode normal command.

Step 3 translates to

:norm ggVGp

See the documentation in :help :norm,

:norm[al][!] {commands}			*:norm* *:normal*
	Execute Normal mode commands {commands}.  This makes
	it possible to execute Normal mode commands typed on
	the command-line.  {commands} are executed like they
	are typed.

You could also combine :d and :put,

:%d|pu!2
  • % is a range that means "all lines".
  • d, short for delete, deletes all in that range.
  • | is the command separator.
  • pu, short for put, inserts text from register 2.

line 4 turns up in register 2 after being displaced from register 1 by the remaining lines deleted by %d.

That would leave an empty line behind, so a pedantically correct answer would be

:%d|pu!2|$d
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Resulting Questions (3 comments)
Resulting Questions
mcp‭ wrote about 2 years ago · edited about 2 years ago

This is a very enlightening post. Please let me know if the following questions belong in their own post.

1. Is there a way to view a list of all available ex commands like delete, put, etc.?

2. I am used to registers being represented with ". Why is it ! in this context and how did you find this?

3. Is it possible to rewrite :%d|pu!2 with a named register, by deleting into and putting from register s for "save".

Edit: Odd, the numbers of the numbered list above are not showing.

Edit: I had to escape the .s for it to work: 1\..

Quasímodo‭ wrote about 2 years ago · edited about 2 years ago

mcp‭,

1. All in a single list? I don't think so. You can always find each of them with :h :delete, etc.

2. ! is not a register, it's a "modifier" available in many Ex commands. See :h :pu for example.

3. Yes, but you would need to modify the MWE so as to step 2 be "sdd instead. Then the answer would be %d|pu!s.

mcp‭ wrote about 2 years ago

Very, very cool! Thank you for the thorough response!