Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to the Power Users community on Codidact!

Power Users is a Q&A site for questions about the usage of computer software and hardware. We are still a small site and would like to grow, so please consider joining our community. We are looking forward to your questions and answers; they are the building blocks of a repository of knowledge we are building together.

Post History

50%
+0 −0
Q&A What is a good browser suitable for every-day use that respects user privacy and freedom?

Pale Moon Pale moon is technically a Firefox based browser, but it has diverged considerably over the years. It was originally a fork of an old version and has retained many "good old" FF features...

posted 7mo ago by matthewsnyder‭  ·  edited 7mo ago by matthewsnyder‭

Answer
#3: Post edited by user avatar matthewsnyder‭ · 2023-10-06T15:45:09Z (7 months ago)
  • ## Pale Moon
  • Pale moon is technically a Firefox based browser, but it has diverged considerably over the years. It was originally a fork of an old version and has retained many "good old" FF features which were replaced with arguably inferior designs by Mozilla:
  • * In 2014, Firefox overhauled its UI and changed to Australis (v29). Australis was less flexible and had worse usability (following mobile-like UI trends) for power users, but presumably Mozilla felt the need to do this so that it could expand into the mobile market. PM stuck with the pre-2014 classic interface.
  • * PM's dev team maintains their own rendering engine, Goanna, which was forked from Gecko (used by FF). I am not aware of any significant practical consequence from this for every-day web usage. Sometimes, poorly made websites designed for Gecko may not work quite right, but this seems rare.
  • * In 2017, Firefox declared XUL extensions "legacy" and began switching to new WebExtensions. WebExtensions are more limited, ostensibly for security, and some existing extensions were either discontinued or had features degraded as a result. PM remains compatible with old FF extensions (XUL). They also claim to expand the format, but I don't know exactly what additions they make.
  • I'm part of the "old guard" so I think the PM UI is excellent.
  • For regular browsing it seems to work quite well. There is always the push/pull problem: FF need not struggle to stay compatible with websites because web authors see it as a de facto standard and make an effort to stay compatible with FF. But they do not bother (or even know about) PM, so it is up to PM to ensure compatibility with millions of websites. It's rare that PM breaks a site, but when it happens your main recourse is to ask the small PM community for help.
  • Back in 2017, the extensions were great, better than FF. Many did not have a WebExtension update yet, so you could use them in PM but not in FF. Even the updated ones were often better in PM (in their old XUL versions). Now that it's been 6 years, a lot of those original FF extensions are obsolete and don't work well. The PM community continues to develop some XUL extensions for PM, but they are smaller so there's not as many.
  • Lastly, the PM dev team is small and opinionated. Sometimes they make surprising, radical decisions. For example, in the past the main PM dev declared that ad blocking was unethical, which caused some chaos because the main PM extension delivery mechanism (where ad blockers are served) is also maintained by the same PM devs. I cannot adequately describe the culture and politics here, so I would recommend checking out the PM forums when considering switching to it, because that will be your main place for support with PM issues.
  • ## Pale Moon
  • Pale moon is technically a Firefox based browser, but it has diverged considerably over the years. It was originally a fork of an old version and has retained many "good old" FF features which were replaced with arguably inferior designs by Mozilla:
  • * In 2014, Firefox overhauled its UI and changed to Australis (v29). Australis was less flexible and had worse usability (following mobile-like UI trends) for power users, but presumably Mozilla felt the need to do this so that it could expand into the mobile market. PM stuck with the pre-2014 classic interface.
  • * PM's dev team maintains their own rendering engine, Goanna, which was forked from Gecko (used by FF). I am not aware of any significant practical consequence from this for every-day web usage. Sometimes, poorly made websites designed for Gecko may not work quite right, but this seems rare.
  • * In 2017, Firefox declared XUL extensions "legacy" and began switching to new WebExtensions. WebExtensions are more limited, ostensibly for security, and some existing extensions were either discontinued or had features degraded as a result. PM remains compatible with old FF extensions (XUL). They also claim to expand the format, but I don't know exactly what additions they make.
  • I'm part of the "old guard" so I think the PM UI is excellent.
  • For regular browsing it seems to work quite well. There is always the push/pull problem: FF need not struggle to stay compatible with websites because web authors see it as a de facto standard and make an effort to stay compatible with FF. But they do not bother testing on (or even know about) PM, so it is up to PM to ensure compatibility with millions of websites. It's rare that PM breaks a site, but when it happens your main recourse is to ask the small PM community for help.
  • Back in 2017, the extensions were great, better than FF. Many did not have a WebExtension update yet, so you could use them in PM but not in FF. Even the updated ones were often better in PM (in their old XUL versions). Now that it's been 6 years, a lot of those original FF extensions are obsolete and don't work well. The PM community continues to develop some XUL extensions for PM, but they are smaller so there's not as many.
  • Lastly, the PM dev team is small and opinionated. Sometimes they make surprising, radical decisions. For example, in the past the main PM dev declared that ad blocking was unethical, which caused some chaos because the main PM extension delivery mechanism (where ad blockers are served) is also maintained by the same PM devs. I cannot adequately describe the culture and politics here, so I would recommend checking out the PM forums when considering switching to it, because that will be your main place for support with PM issues.
#2: Post edited by user avatar matthewsnyder‭ · 2023-10-06T15:44:35Z (7 months ago)
  • ## Pale Moon
  • Pale moon is technically a Firefox based browser, but it has diverged considerably over the years. It was originally a fork of an old version and has retained many "good old" FF features which were replaced with arguably inferior designs by Mozilla:
  • * In 2014, Firefox overhauled its UI and changed to Australis (v29). Australis was less flexible and had worse usability (following mobile-like UI trends) for power users, but presumably Mozilla felt the need to do this so that it could expand into the mobile market. PM stuck with the pre-2014 classic interface.
  • * PM's dev team maintains their own rendering engine, Goanna, which was forked from Gecko (used by FF). I am not aware of any significant practical consequence from this for every-day web usage. Sometimes, poorly made websites designed for Gecko may not work quite right, but this seems rare.
  • * In 2017, Firefox declared XUL extensions "legacy" and began switching to new WebExtensions. WebExtensions are more limited, ostensibly for security, and some existing extensions were either discontinued or had features degraded as a result. PM remains compatible with old FF extensions (XUL). They also claim to expand the format, but I don't know exactly what additions they make.
  • I'm part of the "old guard" so I think the PM UI is excellent.
  • For regular browsing it seems to work quite well. There is always the push/pull problem: FF need not struggle to stay compatible with websites because web authors see it as a de facto standard and make an effort to stay compatible with FF. But they do not bother (or even know about) PM, so it is up to PM to ensure compatibility with millions of websites. It's rare that PM breaks a site, but when it happens your main recourse is to ask the small PM community for help.
  • Back in 2017, the extensions were great, better than FF. Many did not have a WebExtension update yet, so you could use them in PM but not in FF. Even the updated ones were often better in PM (in their old XUL versions). Now that it's been 6 years, a lot of those original FF extensions are obsolete and don't work well. The PM community continues to develop some XUL extensions for PM, but they are smaller so there's not as many.
  • Lastly, the PM dev team is small and opinionated. Sometimes they make surprising, radical decisions. For example, in the past the main PM dev declared that ad blocking was unethical, which caused some chaos because the main PM extension delivery mechanism (where ad blockers are served) is also maintained by the same PM devs. I cannot adequately describe the culture and politics here, so I would recommend checking out the PM forums when considering switching to it, because that will be your main place to for support with PM issues.
  • ## Pale Moon
  • Pale moon is technically a Firefox based browser, but it has diverged considerably over the years. It was originally a fork of an old version and has retained many "good old" FF features which were replaced with arguably inferior designs by Mozilla:
  • * In 2014, Firefox overhauled its UI and changed to Australis (v29). Australis was less flexible and had worse usability (following mobile-like UI trends) for power users, but presumably Mozilla felt the need to do this so that it could expand into the mobile market. PM stuck with the pre-2014 classic interface.
  • * PM's dev team maintains their own rendering engine, Goanna, which was forked from Gecko (used by FF). I am not aware of any significant practical consequence from this for every-day web usage. Sometimes, poorly made websites designed for Gecko may not work quite right, but this seems rare.
  • * In 2017, Firefox declared XUL extensions "legacy" and began switching to new WebExtensions. WebExtensions are more limited, ostensibly for security, and some existing extensions were either discontinued or had features degraded as a result. PM remains compatible with old FF extensions (XUL). They also claim to expand the format, but I don't know exactly what additions they make.
  • I'm part of the "old guard" so I think the PM UI is excellent.
  • For regular browsing it seems to work quite well. There is always the push/pull problem: FF need not struggle to stay compatible with websites because web authors see it as a de facto standard and make an effort to stay compatible with FF. But they do not bother (or even know about) PM, so it is up to PM to ensure compatibility with millions of websites. It's rare that PM breaks a site, but when it happens your main recourse is to ask the small PM community for help.
  • Back in 2017, the extensions were great, better than FF. Many did not have a WebExtension update yet, so you could use them in PM but not in FF. Even the updated ones were often better in PM (in their old XUL versions). Now that it's been 6 years, a lot of those original FF extensions are obsolete and don't work well. The PM community continues to develop some XUL extensions for PM, but they are smaller so there's not as many.
  • Lastly, the PM dev team is small and opinionated. Sometimes they make surprising, radical decisions. For example, in the past the main PM dev declared that ad blocking was unethical, which caused some chaos because the main PM extension delivery mechanism (where ad blockers are served) is also maintained by the same PM devs. I cannot adequately describe the culture and politics here, so I would recommend checking out the PM forums when considering switching to it, because that will be your main place for support with PM issues.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar matthewsnyder‭ · 2023-10-06T15:44:24Z (7 months ago)
## Pale Moon

Pale moon is technically a Firefox based browser, but it has diverged considerably over the years. It was originally a fork of an old version and has retained many "good old" FF features which were replaced with arguably inferior designs by Mozilla:

* In 2014, Firefox overhauled its UI and changed to Australis (v29). Australis was less flexible and had worse usability (following mobile-like UI trends) for power users, but presumably Mozilla felt the need to do this so that it could expand into the mobile market. PM stuck with the pre-2014 classic interface.
* PM's dev team maintains their own rendering engine, Goanna, which was forked from Gecko (used by FF). I am not aware of any significant practical consequence from this for every-day web usage. Sometimes, poorly made websites designed for Gecko may not work quite right, but this seems rare.
* In 2017, Firefox declared XUL extensions "legacy" and began switching to new WebExtensions. WebExtensions are more limited, ostensibly for security, and some existing extensions were either discontinued or had features degraded as a result. PM remains compatible with old FF extensions (XUL). They also claim to expand the format, but I don't know exactly what additions they make.

I'm part of the "old guard" so I think the PM UI is excellent.

For regular browsing it seems to work quite well. There is always the push/pull problem: FF need not struggle to stay compatible with websites because web authors see it as a de facto standard and make an effort to stay compatible with FF. But they do not bother (or even know about) PM, so it is up to PM to ensure compatibility with millions of websites. It's rare that PM breaks a site, but when it happens your main recourse is to ask the small PM community for help.

Back in 2017, the extensions were great, better than FF. Many did not have a WebExtension update yet, so you could use them in PM but not in FF. Even the updated ones were often better in PM (in their old XUL versions). Now that it's been 6 years, a lot of those original FF extensions are obsolete and don't work well. The PM community continues to develop some XUL extensions for PM, but they are smaller so there's not as many.

Lastly, the PM dev team is small and opinionated. Sometimes they make surprising, radical decisions. For example, in the past the main PM dev declared that ad blocking was unethical, which caused some chaos because the main PM extension delivery mechanism (where ad blockers are served) is also maintained by the same PM devs. I cannot adequately describe the culture and politics here, so I would recommend checking out the PM forums when considering switching to it, because that will be your main place to for support with PM issues.