Welcome to the Power Users community on Codidact!
Power Users is a Q&A site for questions about the usage of computer software and hardware. We are still a small site and would like to grow, so please consider joining our community. We are looking forward to your questions and answers; they are the building blocks of a repository of knowledge we are building together.
Post History
My new company has this IT policy for emailing attachments. Does it make sense? The Chief Technology Officer (CTO) claims that sending attachments in a follow-up email is safer than sending a sing...
#1: Initial revision
by
7095
·
2025-05-13T22:21:46Z (about 20 hours ago)
reasonable to mandate sending attachments in a separate follow-up email to ensure that the recipient receives at least one message?
My new company has this IT policy for emailing attachments. Does it make sense? The Chief Technology Officer (CTO) claims that sending attachments in a follow-up email is safer than sending a single email with attachments. The reasoning is that if the recipient's email system flags the second email with attachments as spam, they will still receive the first email without attachments and be aware that the follow-up email with attachments is missing. Without this policy, if the single email is flagged as spam, the recipient may miss the entire message.