Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to the Power Users community on Codidact!

Power Users is a Q&A site for questions about the usage of computer software and hardware. We are still a small site and would like to grow, so please consider joining our community. We are looking forward to your questions and answers; they are the building blocks of a repository of knowledge we are building together.

Post History

71%
+3 −0
Q&A Ethernet connection to Slate 7 slower than WiFi connection

It turns out the resolution was the Network Acceleration option. It is enabled and set to Hardware Acceleration by default. Setting it to Software Acceleration or turning it off entirely resolves t...

posted 8mo ago by Derek Elkins‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Derek Elkins‭ · 2026-01-14T00:21:03Z (8 months ago)
It turns out the resolution was the [Network Acceleration](https://docs.gl-inet.com/router/en/4/interface_guide/network_acceleration/) option. It is enabled and set to Hardware Acceleration by default. Setting it to Software Acceleration or turning it off entirely resolves the issue. I currently just have it completely disabled.

I hadn't tried changing this option earlier, because it seemed counter-productive. In my case, it doesn't seem to cause any significant performance decrease for the WiFi connected devices and also does not seem to cause significant CPU load on the router itself. A benefit of *not* using Network Acceleration is that the speeds reported in the UI are accurate.

I'm not sure *why* Hardware Acceleration causes this issue. The [documentation mentions](https://docs.gl-inet.com/router/en/4/interface_guide/hardware_acceleration/) that it can interact poorly with Smart Queue Management (SQM). I had set up SQM on the device directly through LuCI, but disabling it and changing queuing discipline settings on the desktop didn't seem to resolve the issue. I don't know if merely *installing* the SQM package on the router caused the issue. Again, the devices connected via WiFi did see the latency differences of enabling SQM without having their performance destroyed.