Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to the Power Users community on Codidact!

Power Users is a Q&A site for questions about the usage of computer software and hardware. We are still a small site and would like to grow, so please consider joining our community. We are looking forward to your questions and answers; they are the building blocks of a repository of knowledge we are building together.

Comments on Why can reversing the order of the same words 1. lower the total character count, and 2. eliminate the short last line of a para.?

Post

Why can reversing the order of the same words 1. lower the total character count, and 2. eliminate the short last line of a para.?

+0
−3

I started using Microsoft Word ever since I was 5, but I never knew of this trick until I read the following! Why does this gambit work, when the word count remains the same?

(c) Word-order changes

To eliminate the short last line of a paragraph, you might be able to change the order of items in a list to fill in space at end of a line. For example, in Table 11A, by reversing the order of the listed items in the sixth line—“perished” or “decayed beyond marketability” to “decayed beyond marketability” or “perished”)—the term “decayed” (at eight characters) now fits into the end of line 5. As a result, the short last line is eliminated, as shown in Table 11B. Note, however, that this strategy cannot be applied to lists with items constrained to a particular order, such as lists with items in chronological order (see Strategy 11).

Image alt text

Sandra Oster, Writing Shorter Legal Documents (2011), p 45.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Did you actually count the actual characters, or is your question just a hot take? (6 comments)
Did you actually count the actual characters, or is your question just a hot take?
elgonzo‭ wrote over 3 years ago · edited over 3 years ago

Did you actually count the actual characters, or is your question just a hot take? In my justified opinion, the assumption your question is based on is completely and totally false.

Canina‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Adding to the above, where does what's discussed in the question body support your claim in the title that the total character count is reduced?

TextKit‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@elgonzo I didn't count the actual characters myself, but I relied on the author's counts in my screenshot.

TextKit‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Canina‭ina Do you see the screenshot? The total character count drops from 783 to 780.

elgonzo‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@VLDR that screenshot also cryptically talks about total line counts of 9 and 8, respectively. Nothing in that screenshot makes obvious sense. Perhaps the book chapter from which you took the screenshot provides meaningful context to what is being claimed in the screenshot, but since you are the one with that book, i guess you have to read it yourself...

Skipping 1 deleted comment.

Chris Henry‭ wrote over 3 years ago

elgonzo‭ See my answer for a longer version, but tl/dr: The part about line count is pretty clearly describing a formatting phenomenon that was true with the settings used in some past version (or even just a draft) of the book, but is not true in the version of the book that TextKit‭ is looking at. The most likely explanation for the change in character count in the original version is auto-hyphenation.