Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to the Power Users community on Codidact!

Power Users is a Q&A site for questions about the usage of computer software and hardware. We are still a small site and would like to grow, so please consider joining our community. We are looking forward to your questions and answers; they are the building blocks of a repository of knowledge we are building together.

Can I post this question — now REwritten and citing Super User — similar to one deleted by moderator?

+0
−2

Just checking before posting the following. Thanks.

Title

Can I await Mozilla or Firefox to unearth the awry Add On(s)awry, before attempting myself? How long needs Firefox?

Body

  1. Does Firefox automatically disable Add Ons that become astray?

  2. Or does Firefox rely on volunteers to warn them of such Add Ons?

  3. I copy this question from Super User. Rather than action DrMoishe Pippik's bifurcation stopgap now myself, can I simply wait for Mozilla — or someone more technologically skillful — to disable the amiss Add On(s)?

My material facts are based on this Super User.

On 27 Jan 2021, I shut down my Windows 10 laptop to buy lunch.

After returning from lunch 2 hours later, I turned on my laptop. But then Firefox stopped loading tabs, while my Internet and my Chrome and Edge browsers were all working perfectly. But my tabs load perfectly when I use Firefox in "Troubleshoot Mode" works perfectly!

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Please carefully read https://powerusers.codidact.com/posts/285726/285729#answer-285729 Even if you a... (1 comment)

1 answer

+3
−0

No, you should not post that question, at least not in this form. Here are some problems:

Can I await Mozilla or Firefox to unearth the awry Add On(s)awry, before attempting myself? How long needs Firefox?

That's too long for a title. The title should be a concise summary.

More importantly, I can't figure out what it means. We use English here. This isn't decipherable as English, at least not without way more effort and guessing than anyone here should have to put up with. Maybe you're not a native English speaker. That's not your fault, but it's not the fault of anyone here either. Such bad writing is very annoying to those that do read English well.

I guess "await" means "wait for". It seems "unearth" is meant to mean "discover" here. Those might be OK if they were the only problems, but "awry Add On(s)awry" makes no sense. That's just too garbled to be allowed here.

Does Firefox automatically disable Add Ons that become astray?

What is an "astray" add-on? The concept makes no sense. The same piece of code doesn't somehow evolve or change over time. There may be new versions, but that doesn't seem to be what you're asking about. It's hard to see how "astray" applies to new versions either.

I copy this question from blah, blah, blah

You do this a lot, and have been told a lot to stop. Pertinent information to a question here needs to be here. Stop with the links all over the place! Personally, I rarely follow a link in a question. It breaks the flow, I don't know where I will end up, and it's annoying in the first place. Links are OK for background info or adjunct information, like a datasheet to a device being asked about on the EE site.

You have abused links so much here that you shouldn't use any links at all in your next few questions.

My material facts are based on this Super User.

Argh, yet another link. No, I'm not going to follow it. What does it mean anyway? Is this going to go to the personal profile of someone you think is a super user? I see "Super User" is capitalized, so a proper noun. What the ...? Ah, do you mean post on Stack Exchange Super User site? If so, that's a long way from what you wrote, and exceedingly lazy. If that's what you really mean, see how saving yourself a second of typing caused considerable confusion? Don't be so lazy.

I'm going to stop here because this is where I would stop reading if this were a real post. I'd then downvote this mess and move on. I'm not downvoting this question here because you're asking about the mess instead of presenting it as a question.

So again, the answer is "It's a mess. Don't post it."

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »